Skip to content

fix: provide database connection options to fx container for circuit breaker #627

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
flemzord wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

fix: provide database connection options to fx container for circuit breaker #627

flemzord wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@flemzord
Copy link
Member

@flemzord flemzord commented Dec 29, 2025

Fix: Provide *bunconnect.ConnectionOptions to the fx container for the Circuit Breaker module.

The Circuit Breaker storage module required *bunconnect.ConnectionOptions as an fx dependency, but it was not being supplied, causing a dependency injection failure. This change uses fx.Supply to directly provide the existing connectionOptions instance to the fx container.

Open in Cursor Open in Web

@cursoragent
fix: provide ConnectionOptions to fx container for circuit breaker
96090f0 
The circuit breaker storage module requires *bunconnect.ConnectionOptions
to create its database connection, but this dependency was not available
in the fx container. Changed from fx.Provide to fx.Supply to directly
inject the existing connectionOptions instance.
@cursor
Copy link

cursor bot commented Dec 29, 2025

Cursor Agent can help with this pull request. Just @cursor in comments and I'll start working on changes in this branch.
Learn more about Cursor Agents

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 29, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

Modifies the Fx dependency injection wiring in cmd/common.go to supply the connectionOptions value directly via fx.Supply() instead of wrapping it in a constructor function via fx.Provide(). This simplifies how the value is made available to the dependency graph without altering runtime behavior.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Fx Dependency Injection Wiring
cmd/common.go		 Replaces constructor-based provider with direct supply of connectionOptions value using fx.Supply() instead of fx.Provide()

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

Poem

A rabbit hops with glee today,
Where Provide() has gone away,
Supply() shines, more direct and bright,
Dependencies wired clean and right! 🐰✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the main change: providing database connection options to the fx container for the circuit breaker module, which directly matches the changeset.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changeset, explaining the fix of providing ConnectionOptions to the fx container and the technical approach using fx.Supply.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch cursor/circuit-breaker-db-connection-5934
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 46f2d51 and 96090f0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cmd/common.go
🔇 Additional comments (2)
cmd/common.go (2)

65-65: No changes needed. The code properly handles type semantics: connectionOptions is a pointer supplied to fx, and storage.Module correctly receives it dereferenced as a value type. Different modules have different injection patterns—storage.Module uses direct parameter passing rather than fx injection, which is why it receives the dereferenced value. This is intentional and consistent.

65-65: Verify that a consumer of *bunconnect.ConnectionOptions from the fx container actually exists.

The change from fx.Provide to fx.Supply is correct for supplying an already-constructed value. However, the commit message mentions that "the circuit breaker storage module requires *bunconnect.ConnectionOptions," but no circuit breaker module consuming this dependency from the fx container was found in the codebase. The storage.Module itself does not consume from fx—it receives the dereferenced value as an explicit argument at line 86.

Confirm that another module injects *bunconnect.ConnectionOptions from the fx container to justify this change, or clarify if this is preparation for future integration.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@flemzord flemzord changed the title Circuit breaker db connection fix: provide database connection options to fx container for circuit breaker Dec 29, 2025
@flemzord flemzord marked this pull request as ready for review December 29, 2025 14:58
@flemzord flemzord requested a review from a team as a code owner December 29, 2025 14:58
fguery
fguery approved these changes Dec 29, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@fguery fguery left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're sure it's not used elsewhere? It's not exactly the same so I prefer asking :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@fguery fguery fguery approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@flemzord @fguery @cursoragent